Quadro FX 580 vs Quadro K2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 68W)
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Quadro K2200
+1898%
1439
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GM107
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
