Quadro FX 580 vs Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 65W)
Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Quadro FX 2700M
+76%
127
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
6
32
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
G94
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
