Home Comparison Quadro FX 580 vs GRID RTX T10 16

Quadro FX 580 vs GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
GRID RTX T10 16 +13787%
9999

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
TU102
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net