Quadro FX 550 vs GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2006
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
TU117
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
