Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs RTX A5000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX A5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
RTX A5000 Mobile
+4088%
19350
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
151.2 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
302.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.35 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.35 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
302.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA104
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
