Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro K100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+41%
462
Quadro K100M
326
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
