Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+263%
462
Quadro FX 2700M
127
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
192 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
