Home Comparison Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Data Center GPU Max 1550

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 600W)
Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +11248%
52430

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
600W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net