Quadro FX 380 vs GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 225W)
GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
35
GRID K260Q
+6440%
2289
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GK104
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
