Quadro FX 380 vs A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)
A10G 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
9200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
35
A10G
+89957%
31520
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
9216
8
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
