Quadro FX 3700 vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
280
Quadro K5200
+1168%
3553
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
78W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK110B
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
