Quadro FX 3700 vs GRID K520
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 225W)
GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
280
GRID K520
+717%
2289
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
78W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
