Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro K5200
+13565%
3553
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
16 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK110B
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
