Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 32W)
Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.32GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro 400
+315%
108
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
6
16
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
16 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GT216
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
