Quadro FX 3450 vs RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 140W)
RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
-
Shading Units
6144
12
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
GA104
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
130 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
