Quadro FX 3450 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 210W)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
60
-
Shading Units
7680
12
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
210W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
AD103
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
