Quadro FX 3450 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 83W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
12
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
AD107
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
