Home Comparison Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon RX 5300 XT

Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 100W)
Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Jul 2005
Release Date
Oct 2019
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
-
Shading Units
1408
12
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

83W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

NV41
GPU Name
Navi 14
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Curie
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net