Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
Shading Units
19456
12
TMUs
1216
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
153 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
N/A