Home Comparison Quadro FX 3450 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

Quadro FX 3450 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Jul 2005
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
Shading Units
4096
12
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
256
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

83W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

NV41
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
Unknown
225 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net