Quadro FX 3450 vs FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 208W)
FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
Shading Units
1600
12
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
Cypress
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Curie
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
