Quadro FX 3450 vs FirePro S9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 225W)
FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
-
Shading Units
1792
12
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
Tahiti
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Curie
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
