Quadro FX 3450 vs CMP 90HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 320W)
CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Jul 2021
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
760.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
50
-
Shading Units
6400
12
TMUs
200
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
200
-
RT Cores
50
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
136.8 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.89 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
21.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
320W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
GA102
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
GA102-100-A1
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
130 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
