Quadro FX 1700 vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Tesla K20c
+5872%
3524
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2496
16
TMUs
208
8
ROPs
40
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK110
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
