Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+13515%
8033
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
