Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro K5200
+5922%
3553
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK110B
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
