Quadro 6000 SDI vs Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 231W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI
+40%
1028
Quadro K2000D
733
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
231W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
