Quadro 3000M vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Tesla C2075
+137%
1028
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
625 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GF110
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
