Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Quadro K3100M
+150%
1084
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GK104
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
