Quadro 2000 vs Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 238W)
Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Tesla C2050
+114%
1028
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
238W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GF100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
