Quadro 2000 vs Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 62W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Quadro K2000D
+52%
733
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK107
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
