Quadro 2000 vs L4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 72W)
L4 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
L4
+6210%
30290
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
60
192
Shading Units
7424
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
72W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
AD104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
