Quadro 2000 vs GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 400W)
GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
GRID A100A
+2793%
13890
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GA100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
