Quadro 2000 vs A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
A10M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
A10M
+4783%
23440
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
7168
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GA102
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
