Quadro 1000M vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
269
RTX A1000 Embedded
+2377%
6664
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
60W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
GA107S
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
Unknown
116 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
