Quadro 1000M vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
269
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+6141%
16790
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
DG2-512
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
