L4 vs Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L4 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
7408 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 72W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L4
+116400%
30290
Quadro FX 360M
26
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
2
7424
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
72W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
G86
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
