L4 vs Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L4 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
7376 additional rendering cores
Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 72W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L4
+27946%
30290
Quadro 400
108
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
6
7424
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
72W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT216
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
