L4 vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L4 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 72W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L4
+7077%
30290
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
4
7424
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
72W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF106
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
