L20 vs NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L20 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
11728 additional rendering cores
NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L20
+59250%
59350
NVS 310
100
Graphics Card
Nov 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
92
SM Count
1
11776
Shading Units
48
368
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
275W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
