Home Comparison L20 vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

L20 vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

L20 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (2520MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
11008 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L20 +3146%
59350
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1828

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
Tesla Ada
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

92
SM Count
-
11776
Shading Units
768
368
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GM206
AD102
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net