L20 vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L20 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
11760 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L20
+152079%
59350
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
39
Graphics Card
Nov 2023
Release Date
Oct 2009
Tesla Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
92
SM Count
2
11776
Shading Units
16
368
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
275W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT218
AD102
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
