Home Comparison L20 vs FirePro V5800

L20 vs FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

L20 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
10976 additional rendering cores
FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L20 +5275%
59350
FirePro V5800
1104

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Tesla Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
92
SM Count
-
11776
Shading Units
800
368
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
74W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Juniper
AD102
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net