Home Comparison L20 vs FirePro V3750

L20 vs FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

L20 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
11456 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L20 +16760%
59350
FirePro V3750
352

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
92
SM Count
-
11776
Shading Units
320
368
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
8
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV730
AD102
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net