L20 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
L20 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
11696 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L20
+74087%
59350
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Nov 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Tesla Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
92
SM Count
-
11776
Shading Units
80
368
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
275W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cedar
AD102
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
