Jetson Nano GPU vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock921MHz
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
+159%
236
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
Tegra
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
-
921 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
128
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
C89
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
MCP89
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
20 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
