Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro 5600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1650MHz vs 1035MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Radeon Pro 5600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (394.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534
Radeon Pro 5600M
+109%
5299
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
394.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.24 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
331.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Navi 12
-
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
