Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1650MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+392%
2534
GeForce MX110
515
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Nov 2017
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
256
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GM108S
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.02 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
