Home Comparison Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs FirePro M5950

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +264%
2534
FirePro M5950
696

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
HD Graphics-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Whistler
-
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.716 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net