Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile vs GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile
+2094%
1997
GeForce 320M
91
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
3.994 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Raptor Lake GT1
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
